Wind Power: Issues Related with Microgrid
Dipesh K. Sharma1*, S.P.
Shukla2
1Research
Scholar, Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg
2Bhilai
Institute of Technology, Durg
*Corresponding Author E-mail: dipeshkumarsharma@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
During
disturbances, the distributed
generation and corresponding loads can separate from the distribution system to
isolate the Microgrid’s load from the disturbance
(providing UPS services) without harming the transmission grid’s integrity.
This ability to island generation and loads together has a potential to provide
a higher local reliability than that provided by the power system as a whole. This paper aims to cover various trends and
issues associated with wind power generation and its integration with current
installed capacity and grid complexities.
KEY WORDS: Microgrid,
Distributed generation, power vs. frequency droop, inverters.
I.
INTRODUCTION:
As this
is an age of technological development of power generation where distributed
generation can play significant role to meet the energy requirements of
areas specially at remote areas. Penetration of distributed generation has not
yet reached significant levels[1].
However that situation is changing rapidly and requires attention to issues
related to high penetration of distributed generation within the distribution
system.
India
ranks fifth in the installed capacity of Grid connected electricity in the
world as indicated in the Fig.1. While WEGs have varied type of innovative
conceptual designs, there are two main types one is horizontal axis wind turbines
(HAWT) and the other type is vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT). The former type
has several technological and economical advantages. Further discussions will
be on some design features of GRID connected application of Horizontal Axis
Wind Turbines (HAWT).
Issues
in Wind Power Developments: Availability of accurate wind potential data all
over India is one of the issues. C-WET has assessed more than 620 Stations
spread all over the Country by continuous monitoring of wind as a resource and
identified more than 233 locations as economically viable and wind potential.
As
on date, in India a site which has more than 200 watts per square meter as Wind
Power Density (WPD) which deemed to be economically viable so far is removed.
With recently picked up micro wind generation i.e to exploit
urban wind areas and low wind areas and to facilitate remote village
electrification domestic wind mills of .3 kW to 50 kW are being adopted. This
micro wind generation as on date has a low market demand since it has been
mostly developed as a standalone system which is often not grid connected. The
grid interface system which will have similar concepts such as net metering
along with exporting to grid and importing from the grid in a house connection
is likely to be possible soon. It has fast track implementation of wind power
projects given by Government having fiscal and financial initiative[1].
Another
important issue in any country involved in wind power development is
development of infrastructure facility in wind farmable areas such as roads and
logistics for larger machine components to reach windy Regions.
Other infrastructural facilities for establishment of
human habitation in wind farm and establishment of electrical grid for
evacuation of the power generated by the wind turbines.
Most of the State and Central Government have been concentrating on these
infrastructural developments and hence wind power in India has become more
viable and the growth is sustained at the global rate of more than 20% every year.Wind Generation is cumulative over the years hence
higher than even in Tamil Nadu where 40% of Wind power is installed. The other
extreme is Madhya Pradesh where machines are getting installed every year but
the generation is not happening, which may be due to low wind, inappropriate WEG
efficiency , generation data update errors, or machine or grid failures related
to operation and maintenance issues..While steady growth of WUI is indicative
of orderly development any extreme as well as fluctuations the regulators/Grid
operators and the investors need to be concerned to set the wind generation
more useful.
Engineering
design of horizontal axis wind turbines requires an interdisciplinary
approach involving composite material and meteorological sciences, aeronautical,
mechanical, electrical, electronic control and civil engineering. Before we
proceed with the engineering design of a turbine, we have to identify a windy
location and assess the resource i.e. wind.
However
the maximum available power, when the wind flows past a wind turbine’s rotor would be limited by a power coefficient,
which will depend on the diameter of the rotor, frequency and speed of the
rotor, aerodynamic characteristics of the rotor blades, and above all the wind
speed at 5 to 6 diameters in front of the rotor and the turbulence of wind and
terrain conditions of the site[2].
The
most important prime mover of the wind turbine is the rotor which consists of
one to three blades assembled into a hub at the tip of a rotating shaft. The
blade cross-section along the length is normally of aerofoil sections stacked with smooth
twist and transition.
Some details of
such section are discussed later in the blade structural design lecture.
The important criteria for the blade configuration are light weight, high
strength, excellent fatigue endurance and robustness for operational dynamic
stresses, and durability for the entire design life of the wind turbine[3]. The aerodynamic controls that would be required
for the rotor would also govern the sectional modifications of the blade tip,
which would serve as aerodynamic brake at times of need by design. The other
parameters will be the constant/variable RPM of rotor, upwind/downwind
functioning of the turbine, large deflection characteristics of the blade,
natural frequencies of blades and rotor. Mostly composite materials are adopted
for blade analysis, design and manufacturing.
Most
of the wind turbine blades are made of fibre
reinforced composites, with multiple layers of glass fibre
or carbon fibre embedded in epoxy/polymer resins.
The
commercial blades are of size ranging from 11m to 45m in India. A blade test facility
would require a hard test bed with anchorages for fixing the blade root. The
loading is either applied by pulley and guy arrangement or using hydrodynamic
jack systems with computerised controls for applying
the required load to the blade and simultaneously measure the stresses in the
blade under static and cyclic loading conditions.
The
rotor in the case of HAWT is an assembled hub consisting of 2 or 3 blades
fitted to a low speed shaft. These blades derive an optimum lift force spread
along their longitudinal axis from the root to the tip of the blade by their
intrinsic aerodynamic shape and rotates the rotor.
Since
the wind force is proportional to the square of velocity, as the wind speed
increases the rotor
while rotating has to resist that drag force which acts as a wind- frictional
brake pressing the rotor to stop. So, most rotors can harness wind power
efficiently only from about 3 m/s (cut-in) to 25m/s (cut-out) wind speeds
beyond which the rotor has to come to a halt (stalled and feathered-out of
wind) [4]. To reduce the fatigue stresses at blade root can be hinged to the
hub or rotor may have teethered (a ball and Socket type
of hinge) connection at the shaft tip.
The
machine design depends on the type of wind turbine adopted to convert the
kinetic energy in Wind
to mechanical energy and finally to that of electrical energy of
constant voltage and frequency. In India it is 220 volts with 50 Hz. The
conventional technique is to convert the low rotational energy through a system
of step-up gears
and then the high speed shaft is then connected to the generator. Some of the
latest use direct drive techniques which means the wind rotor is connected
through gearless interface to generator or back to back mounted generator.
The
drive train is an interface between the wind rotor and the generator, the
design of which is governed by the active/passive controls such as blade
stall/pitch that are needed to the rotor for efficient power capture in the
wind. Some modern wind machines are directly driven without gears.
There
are four types of generators in use in the grid connected application of wind electric generators.
These can be grouped mainly into two, one having the old fixed speed induction
type, and the other with variable speed multi-pole/permanent magnet-based.
The
later ones have better connectivity for grid connected application of WEGs. In
India we use 220 volts with 50 Hz in general. The usual low speed rotor speed
(revolutions per minute, 10 to 40 RPM) needs to be stepped up (50 Hz = 50
cycles/s = 3000 cycles/minute = 1500 RPM per pole in the case of a 2-pole
generator) to interface with the generator whose output needs to be synchronised to the GRID for public utility.
II. SINGLE TURBINE AND MULTIPLE TURBINES:
A.
Single Turbine Representation (STR)
In this section, we look at a wind power plant
represented by one group of wind turbines. This is the worst-case assumption
because we assume that all the wind turbines in this group are synchronized.
Thus, the same wind fluctuations and tower shadow effects will affect the
output power of the wind power plant and the power quality at the PCC[5].
B.
Multiple Turbine Representation (MTR)
In this section, we focus on the aggregation
impact on the wind power plant output at the PCC. We use the same wind
turbulence intensity and the same impedance of the transmission line. We
measured the real and reactive power fluctuations, the voltage fluctuations,
and at the PCC of a wind power plant. We quantified the difference in power and
voltage fluctuations level if we treat a wind power plant as a single turbine
or as multiple groups of turbines. The flicker level measurement can be
implemented using design specification in IEC 61000-4-15 [1]. Ideally we would
like to model every wind turbine on the wind power plant. Unfortunately, a
large wind power plant can have more than 100 wind turbines on site. Therefore,
it is not possible to represent all the turbines simultaneously, because the
computing time would be excessive. To closely represent a real wind power plant
without simulating each wind turbine, we made the following assumptions: A
large wind power plant (200 turbines) is divided into several groups of wind
turbines.· The wind speed is uniform for each group of
wind turbines.
C.
Comparison between STR and MTR
To start, consider the time series of wind
speed shown in Figure 3. In an STR, the wind speed is applied to a single
turbine and the output of the single wind turbine is multiplied by the number
of the turbines within the wind power plant. In an MTR, the time series of the
wind speed is subdivided into several sections and each subdivision is applied
to a different group of turbines. For example, for the figure shown, the time
series of wind speed is divided into four different files with the starting
time (t=0) at w1, w2, w3 and w4. This assumption is an approximation of the
time it takes for the wind speed to travel from one group of turbines to
another group of turbines down wind. Although this assumption is not perfect,
by assuming that the wind speed has a characteristic of frozen turbulence, and
that the turbulence does not change as it passes a wind turbine, we can more
closely simulate the real situation. Let us consider the output of STR and MTR
and place the two graphs next to each other for a better comparison. Figure 3
shows variation of real power for both representations taken at the point of
interconnection.
The time scale is changed to make an easier
observation of the nature of power fluctuations within a short time frame. In
these particular traces, the trace of tower shadow is very visible. Tower
shadow effect is the effect of power fluctuations due to power production
deficit every time a blade passes the turbine tower. Usually the tower shadow
has a frequency 3 per revolution. This effect is commonly known as 3 p effects.
Besides the tower shadow, the power variation is also caused by the wind speed
variations with time. For the STR, the power fluctuation reflects the power
fluctuation of a single turbine. It is amplified by the number of turbines
within the wind power plant.
For the MTR, the power fluctuation is the
collective behavior of several groups of wind turbines
with each group fed by a different time series as illustrated in Figure 3.The
label WP1G is a single-group representation and WP16G is a 16-group
representation. Comparing the two graphs, it is obvious that there is some
smoothing effect in the power fluctuations if we consider that the wind power
plant consists of sixteen different groups of wind turbines. Figure 3 shows the
voltage fluctuations as the wind speed varies with two different
representations. The STR obviously shows very large variations of the voltage
at the point of interconnection as the wind speed varies while the output
voltage for 16 groups representation shows a much smaller voltage swings[5].
Wind
energy cannot be fully captured by any wind machine as on date but it should
start generating power when wind speed exceeds cut-in ( 3m/s ) and continue
to produce power till cut-out ( 25m/s).
It will stop rotation when the wind speed goes higher than cut-out, 25 m/s
under such conditions the drag force on the rotor dominates acting like a wind
brake on the rotating blades. Hence one has to design the rotor to loose some wind energy even during operation within limits
to maintain the permitted RPM levels of the rotor.
This
has been originally achieved by the passive twist in the blade and by
aero-elastically on the aerofoil section of the blade. Now the technology is
shifting from the stall regulation to pitch
regulation. It has been further improved with active pitch regulation
giving the advantage of using the fluctuations in the natural wind, for more
efficient power generation. Apart from rotor controls, upwind WEGs would
require a yawing system with
controls which would make the rotor seek the wind as it changes directions.
If
one tries to use the directly connected wind rotor to a induction generator the
generated electricity is of AC (alternating current) ;
but the output will vary as the wind varies. Our electrical gadgets will be
flickering as the wind power varies. So, to connect the wind generated
electricity to any utility grid (transmission and distribution system) the
designer needs get the generator output in the grid voltage and frequencies
(220V/50Hz in India and 110V/60Hz in USA). This primary need forces one to use
sophisticated power electronics for all the control functions and output power
conditioning especially when it is variable speed operation. Grid interfacing
of Wind electric Generators will be covered in a special lecture in this
course.
Alternative torque converters to power
electronics:
Power
electronics in some low temperature areas has functional difficulties for
ensuring reliability of operation of wind turbines and also needs special
requirements for onshore and offshore applications. Recently some of the
automobile spare manufacturers have
demonstrated applications of variable speed couplers in combination with torque
converters which have wide applications under adverse temperature conditions as
well as onshore/offshore wind turbines without altering the design conditions.
The
basic idea being the replacement of power electronics demand for variable speed
operation of wind turbine due to fluctuating nature of wind to a fluid coupled
variable torque to constant torque converter thus ensuring the use of
conventional induction generators more reliably in varying wind and grid
conditions.
The
traditional squirrel cage induction generators which convert AC-AC as the wind
varies has been shifting to synchronised AC-DC-AC
type of generators ( doubly fed induction generators (DFIG), wound rotor
generators, back mounted direct drive generators and permanent magnet
generators (PMG)) for efficient power capture from the wind.
Modern
developments like torque converters using variable speed fluid couplers,
magnetic levitation based rotating systems are likely to become cost effective
bringing down the cost of wind generated electricity to lower levels.
In
the aero dynamic controls, the shift is taking place from traditional stall
control to pitch control and modern machines have active controls independently
for stall as well as pitch mechanism. These sophisticated active controls
require power electronics and
hydraulics interfacing with various systems. Some of the latest
WEGs use electro-magnetic/mechanical control systems instead of hydraulics.
Globally
installed capacity of WEGs has crossed 200 GW. Indian Energy Industries have a
total installed capacity of 184 GW of Electricity generations as on date, of
which about 19 GW is from all Renewable Energy Sources in which about 14 GW is
from Wind Energy. Wind is one of the fastest and most viable Renewable energy
technologies. In India, the annual capacity addition per year
, in 2010-11 is currently about 2300 MW. India also has about 1MW of
wind- solar hybrid domestic system which are mostly used as standalone
applications.
India
has got an ambitious plan to exploit in full, the wind energy potential in the
Country which is estimated to be 49 GW
of which only
20% has been
exploited as on date.
However,
this amounts to about 3 to 5% of net electricity generated in India.
Steps
to follow for a wind power project are as follows:
·
Wind
Resource Assessment through measurements, micro surveying and potential site
identification
·
Choice
of the capacity and the number of the wind turbines for the identified sites
for wind farming
·
Micrositing of the wind turbines in a particular wind farm
·
Erection
and commissioning of wind turbines
·
Establishment
of continuous monitoring systems like SCADA
·
Grid
connection of wind turbines
·
Power
quality measurements and feed back
·
Wind
resource prediction/forecasting and load scheduling to load demand and
Generation Management
·
Power
trading options across inter-state boundaries
Worldwide
there is growing interest to harness this free, not-needing storage,
not-needing transport, abundantly available renewable clean and green energy.
Wind
electricity generation has been steadily increasing in some countries and world
leaders being, Denmark 21% energy penetration, Portugal 18%, Spain 16% Germany
9%, India 3-4%, USA 2% and China 1.2%. Wind as a fuel for electricity
generation is free, pollution free, devoid of the need to transport and to
store. More than everything it is renewable.
It
is well known that wind is natural and is infirm power and the implications of
infirmity are:
•
Wind
power cannot be scheduled
•
Needs a
spinning reserve or alternate power
•
Wind
generators bank energy and demand during peak hours
•
Electricity
Board pays for both base power purchase and wind generation
•
Grid stability
and low voltage, high frequency due to wind farm operations
•
Needs
research for economic storage to avoid wastage of free wind power
Weather
triggered random wind and wind generation can be forecast to make the infirm
power as dispatchable firm power. Some successful
energy storage techniques such as pumped storage hydel
(PSH), compressed Air energy storage systems and flow battery (NaS) systems at world’s wind farms are proven to be
practical solutions.
It
is well known that wind is certainly an inexhaustible abundant source of energy
which is caused by the differential solar radiation on the Earth’s geo-diverse
surfaces, having different degrees of absorption/ reflection/
refraction/convection/transmission. Wind power is not only a renewable green
source of energy; but also results in significant saving of potable/drinking
water, which is much needed for human survival.
III. MICROGRID CONCEPT:
To
realize the emerging potential of distributed generation one must take a system
approach which views generation and associated loads as a subsystem or a “microgrid” [4]. During disturbances, the generation and
corresponding loads can separate from the distribution system to isolate the microgrid’s load from the disturbance (and thereby
maintaining service) without harming the transmission grid’s integrity.
The
difficult task is to achieve this functionality without extensive custom
engineering and still have high system reliability and generation placement
flexibility. To achieve this we promote a peer-to-peer and plug-and-play model
for each component of the microgrid. The peer-to-peer
concept insures that there are no components, such as a master controller or
central storage unit that is critical for operation of the microgrid.
This implies that the microgrid can continue
operating with loss of any component or generator. With one additional source
(N+1) we can insure complete functionality with the loss of any source.
Plug-and-play implies that a unit can be placed at any point on the electrical
system without re- engineering the controls.
Plug-and-play
functionality is much akin to the flexibility one has when using a home
appliance. That is it can be attached to the electrical system at the location
where it is needed. The traditional model is to cluster generation at a single
point that makes the electrical application simpler. The plug-and-play model
facilitates placing generators near the heat loads thereby allowing more
effective use of waste heat without complex heat distribution systems such as
steam and chilled water pipes.
This
ability to island generation and loads together has the potential to provide a
higher local reliability than that provided by the power system as a whole.
Smaller units, having power ratings in thousands of watts, can provide even
higher reliability and fuel efficiency. These units can create higher
reliability and fuel efficiency. These units can create microgrid
services at customer sites such as office buildings, industrial parks and
homes. Since the smaller units are modular, site management could decide to
have more units (N+) than required by the electrical/heat load, providing
local, online backup if one or more of the operating units failed. It is also much
easier to place small generators near the heat loads thereby allowing more
effective use of waste heat.
Figure- 1 Microgrid
Basic
Microgrid architecture is shown in figure 2. This
consists of a group of radial feeders, which could be part of a distribution
system or a
building’s electrical system. There is a single point of connection to the
utility called point of common coupling. Some feeders, (Feeders A-C) have sensitive
loads, which require local generation. The non- critical load feeders do not
have any local generation. In our example this is Feeder D. Feeders A-C can island from the grid
using the static switch which can separate in less than a cycle [5]. In this
example there are four microsources at nodes 8, 11,
16 and 22, which control the operation using only local voltages and currents measurments. When there is a problem with the utility
supply the static switch will open, isolating the sensitive loads from the
power grid. Feeder D loads ride through the event. It is assumed that there is
sufficient generation to meet the loads’ demand. When the Microgrid
is grid-connected power from the local generation can be directed to feeder D.
Figure-
2 Microsource Controller
IV. MICROGRID CONTROL:
Inverters
can provide the control and flexibility required for plug-and-play
functionally. Microgrid controls need to insure that;
new microsources can be added to the system without modification
of existing equipment, the Microgrid can connect to
or isolate itself from the grid in a rapid and seamless fashion, reactive and
active power can be independently controlled, and can meet the dynamic needs of the loads
Microsource controller techniques described
below rely on the inverter interfaces found in fuel cells, microturbines,
and storage technologies. A key element of the control design is that
communication among microsources is unnecessary for
basic Microgrid operation. Each microsource
controller must be able to respond effectively to system changes without requiring
data from the loads or other sources.
Operation
of the Microgrid assumes that the power electronic controls
of current microsources are modified to provide a set
of key functions, which currently do not exist. These control functions include
the ability to; regulate power flow on feeders; regulate the voltage at the
interface of each microsource; ensure that each microsource rapidly pickups up its share of the load when
the system islands.
In
addition to these control functions the ability of the system to island
smoothly and automatically reconnect to the bulk power system is another
important operational function. Figure 3 is a block diagram of the microsource controller. The critical system performance
components are the voltage versus reactive power droop and power versus
frequency droop.
Figure – 3 Dynamics of Test Microgrid
Integration
of large numbers of microsources into a Microgrid is not possible with basic unity power factor
controls. Voltage regulation is necessary for local reliability and stability. Without
local voltage control, systems with high penetrations of microsources could experience voltage and/or reactive power
oscillations. Voltage control must also insure that there are no large
circulating reactive currents between sources. With small errors in voltage set
points, the circulating current can exceed the ratings of the microsources. This situation requires a voltage vs.
reactive power droop controller so that, as the reactive power generated by the
microsource becomes more capacitive, the local
voltage set point is reduced. Conversely, as Q becomes more inductive, the
voltage set point is increased.
Microgrids can provide premium power
functions using control techniques where the Microgrid
can island smoothly and automatically reconnect to the bulk power system, much like
a UPS system. In island mode, problems from slight errors in frequency
generation at each inverter and the need to Kvar change power-operating points to match
load changes need be addressed. Power vs. frequency droop functions at each microsource can effectively solve these problems without a
communication network. When the Microgrid is
connected to the grid, Microgrid loads receive power
both from the grid and from local microsources,
depending on the customer’s situation. If the grid power is lost because of voltage
drops, faults, blackouts, etc., the Microgrid can
transfer smoothly to island operation. When the Microgrid
separates from the
grid, the voltage phase angles at each microsource in
the Microgrid change, resulting in an apparent
reduction in local frequency. This frequency reduction coupled with a power
increase allows for each microsource to provide its proportional
share of power.
Figure-
4 Real and Reactive Power Response for DR-8 and DR-11
V.CONCLUSION:
The
work on the Microgrid has progressed well. Wind Power is contributing considerable
share in Microgrid . This paper covers various trends and issues
associated with wind power generation and its integration with current
installed capacity and grid complexities.
VI.
REFERENCES:
[1] M. Valenti “Reaching
for 60 percent, the General
Electric H turbine
system taking shape in Wales is making a bid for a new record in thermal efficiency.”
Mechanical Engineering, April
2002.
[2] Colleen Williams,
“CHP Systems,”
Distributed Energy, March/April 2004, pp.57-59.
[3] Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy,
U.S. Department of Energy, “2001
BTS Core Databook,” Office
of Building Technology,
July 13, 2001
[4] Lasseter, R.,” MicroGrids,” IEEE PES Winter Meeting, January 2002 Zang, H., M. Chandorkar, G. Venkataramanan, “Development
of Static Switchgear for Utility
Interconnection in a Microgrid.” Power and Energy Systems PES, Feb. 24-26, 2003, Palm Springs,
CA.
[5] Illindals, M., G. Venkataramanan,
“Battery Energy Storage for Stand- Alone Micro-Source Distributed
Generating System,“ 6th IASTED
Intl. Conf. On power and
Energy Systems
[6] Joshua Earnest and Tore Wizelius,
“Wind Power Plants and Project Development”, Eastern economic edition, PHI Learning Private Limited, New
Delhi, 2011
[7] Siraj Ahmed, “Wind
energy theory and
practice” , Eastern
economic edition, PHI Learning Private
Limited, New Delhi, 2010.
[8] Pramod Jain, “Wind
Energy Engineering” , Mc Graw Hill and
Tata McGraw Hill Company, New Delhi, 2011
[9] Directory of Indian Wind Power 2010, 10th edition, Consolidated Energy Consultants
Limited, Bhopal-462023.
Received on 07.03.2015 Accepted on
01.04.2015
©A&V Publications all right reserved
Research J. Engineering
and Tech. 6(2):April-June,2015page 250-257
DOI: 10.5958/2321-581X.2015.00038.0